The Samsung Galaxy... Thing Is Just A Stone

You may have seen this image before:

As a pro-iPhone person, you can imagine that this might've been a bit irritating. But instead of ranting about how half of these aren't even true, I've decided to make my own (which looks a lot worse, but too bad):




                                               Stone                             iPhone                                 Galaxy S2

Integrated Notification Management	no	yes	no
Retina Display	no	yes	no
Wirelessly Syncs Everything To All Your Devices	no	yes	no
Simple, Minimal Home Screen	no	yes	no
Internal A5 Chip	no	yes	no
Proximity Sensor	no	yes	no
PERSONAL ASSISTANT...	no	yes	no
Two 8MP Cameras	no	yes	no
Twitter Integration	no	yes	no
Automatic Downloads	no	yes	no
Flash Free Means No CPU Devouring	no	yes	no
Access To The World's Largest Music Reseller	no	yes	no
Access To The World's Largest Software Reseller	no	yes	no

So by that logic, the Galaxy S2 is a stone, just because it shares a few characteristics with one. That's like saying that because frogs make noise, and tubas make noise, frogs are tubas. If you do want to see my list of what's wrong and what's right, I have a short, rant free one:

1. True

2. True

3. False

4. False

5. False

6. True

7. False

8. True

9. False

10. True

11. False

12. False

13. True

And yes, I do call it the Galaxy Thing.

Stupid Stuff, Part III Of III

Before you read this, read my last two posts, to make this make a bit more sense.

Anyway, so trying to look like everyone else even if you don't like it isn't a good way to be, because it's just supporting the things you don't like. So if you decide not to wear lipstick, or earrings, or have hair that's two feet long, I would approve because it indicates that you think like me. Plus, I think it looks better anyway, but then again that's just my opinion. But even if you do want to do all the stuff I just told you not to do, just please.

Please.

Please.

Don't go around telling me about how I'm wrong, because I'm not.

So I just made a post in multiple parts. It's not something I've ever really done before, and it's not something I've seen anyone else do before, but I think it's a good method, because it makes people want to come back to read the conclusion, and also it allows me to say everything that I want to say, but in short sections, so that casual readers aren't detracted by long sections of text. I know I don't get a lot of views, but if you're reading this (which you probably are), I'd love to know; what you think? Is it a good format? Should I do lots of this, or just use the usual kind? Just shoot me an email at mactavish.alex@gmail.com, or leave a comment below.


Oh, and

?

Yes, this post needs a question mark.

Wow.

Not to insult creationists or anything, but really, it's kind of hard to take you seriously when this is the kind of crap you're trying to argue with.